Posts

Showing posts with the label ideal

When Is a Good Outcome Not Enough?

Image
When Is a Good Outcome Not Enough? When the win leaves fingerprints you should not ignore. Framing the Question “Good outcome not enough” sounds strange in a culture trained to worship results. If the project shipped, the patient recovered, the team won, or the numbers improved, the temptation is to close the file and call the method acceptable. But outcomes can hide moral debt. This question matters because the way we get a result often becomes the precedent for how we chase the next one. When Success Creates Moral Debt A good outcome is not enough to justify the way we got it when the method depends on deception, coercion, avoidable hidden harm, stolen credit, corrupted measurement, or a breach of trust that would matter if the outcome had gone badly. The simplest test is this: would the process still be defensible if the result had been ordinary? That matters because lucky success can launder bad judgment. Psychologists Jonathan Baron and John Hershey called this outcome bias: peopl...