Learn to Think in Color

Does Meritocracy Reward Talent or Access to the Conditions That Develop It? Why Raw Talent Rarely Wins Alone in a So-Called Meritocracy We like to believe in meritocracy : the idea that effort and talent alone determine success. It’s appealing because it promises fairness and justifies outcomes. But what if the real differentiator isn’t innate talent, but access to the conditions that cultivate it? And what if acknowledging this doesn’t mean abandoning standards, but rather understanding how to identify excellence more accurately? This question cuts to the heart of how we structure schools, jobs, and social systems. By reframing what we mean by “merit,” we open the door to smarter policies and more inclusive definitions of success. If you’ve ever wondered why some people rise faster than others with equal talent, read on. The Myth of the Level Playing Field Meritocracy assumes everyone starts from the same line. But in reality, some are born on the track while others have to build it f...

Does Success Depend on Potential or Effort? March 10, 2025 | Growth Mindset, Professional Development, Psychology, Question a Day, Resilience, Talent Question a Day The Talent vs. Effort Debate Success is often attributed to natural talent—we admire "born geniuses" like Einstein, Mozart, or Serena Williams. But is talent really what makes someone successful, or is effort the deciding factor? Carol Dweck’s research suggests that the key to success isn’t just what you’re born with—it’s how you  think about your abilities  and how much  effort  you’re willing to put in. Let’s break it down. 1. The Role of Potential: A Strong Starting Point, But Not Enough Potential refers to innate ability—it includes intelligence, natural skills, and raw talent. Some people grasp new things faster, whether it’s music, math, or sports. Why Potential Matters: ✅  Learning Advantages  – A 2016 study published in  Nature Neuroscience  found that individuals with a higher...