Learn to Think in Color

Why do we remember what stands out from its surroundings? How distinctiveness, surprise, and emotion hack your memory Big Picture Framing We remember what stands out from its surroundings because the brain is wired to notice contrast, not sameness. When something breaks the pattern—a bright red folder in a sea of blue, a joke in a serious meeting—it gets tagged as important. That “this is different” signal draws attention, stirs emotion, and strengthens the memory trace. One way psychologists describe this is the “distinctiveness effect”: we remember what’s unusual, isolated, or surprising compared to everything around it. Understanding why we remember what stands out from its surroundings helps you design information, meetings, and even your own habits so they’re far more memorable. The brain loves contrast, not copies Your brain is constantly flooded with sensory input, and it can’t store all of it. So it cheats: it looks for contrast. Most of everyday life is repetitive and predicta...

When Does Trust Actually Outperform Self-Interest? Why playing the “long game” quietly beats short-term wins Big-picture framing When people argue about  trust vs self-interest , it can sound like a choice between being generous or being a “realist.” But that’s the wrong lens. In many modern workplaces and markets, trust is not the opposite of self-interest—it’s a smarter, longer-horizon version of it. Trust starts to outperform narrow self-interest when the game repeats, reputations travel fast, and the work is too complex for rules to cover every move. Learn to spot those situations, and “doing the right thing” becomes a strategic advantage, not just a moral one. The hidden math of trust vs self-interest Imagine two players: one grabs every short-term advantage, the other plays a long game of reliability and generosity. In a single round, the opportunist usually wins. But life rarely gives you just one round. Trust behaves like compound interest: At first, the gains are invisible...

When Several Explanations Seem to Fit, How Do You Decide Which One to Act On? Occam’s Razor, Bayesian thinking, questionclass, decision, obvious Choosing the most useful story when the truth isn’t fully visible yet Big-picture framing When several explanations seem to fit, your brain begs for a clean story. But the real problem isn’t “What’s true?”—it’s “What should I  actually do next ?” In work, relationships, and strategy, acting on the wrong explanation can quietly waste months. A better approach is to treat explanations as  hypotheses  instead of truths, using simple tools like  Occam’s Razor , light  Bayesian thinking  (updating your beliefs as new evidence shows up), and small reversible experiments. That way, multiple explanations stop being a dead end and become a structured way to learn faster. Why Multiple Explanations Feel Paralyzing When something goes wrong, your mind instantly generates stories: “The market changed.” “The strategy was flawed....