Posts

What tactics do gamification experts use to pull you in?

Image
What tactics do gamification experts use to pull you in? How apps quietly turn everyday actions into “must-do” quests.   Big Picture: Why Gamification Tricks Work on You Gamification tricks show up in loyalty apps, fitness trackers, and even your inbox—turning ordinary tasks into tiny, rewarding games. By blending game mechanics like points, streaks, and progress bars with real-life goals, gamification experts tap into your curiosity, your fear of missing out, and your desire to feel competent. The Hook Behind the Fun At their core, these gamification tricks don’t just make things “fun”; they’re carefully designed to keep you coming back. They leverage feedback loops, social comparison, and variable rewards so every tap or scroll feels like it  might  be meaningful. When you understand how gamification experts design these systems, you’re better equipped to spot the patterns, resist the manipulative versions, and use the same tools for your own healthy habits, products, o...
Post a Comment
Read more

How do you decide whether to start research from the details or from the big picture?

Image
How do you decide whether to start research from the details or from the big picture? Choosing between top-down and bottom-up without overthinking it Framing the question Deciding whether to start with the  big picture vs details in research  is really about choosing the right zoom level:  top-down  or  bottom-up . Top-down research begins from goals, strategy, and hypotheses; bottom-up research starts from observations, data, and concrete problems. The trap is defaulting to your favorite mode instead of matching the approach to the risk and the decision in front of you. This guide gives you a simple way to choose your starting point—and language you can share with colleagues—so everyone understands  why  you’re beginning top-down or bottom-up on a project. The Two Lenses: Big Picture (Top-Down) vs Details (Bottom-Up) Most research mistakes are really zoom mistakes: Too wide, and you never commit. Too close, and you perfect the wrong thing. Think of yo...
Post a Comment
Read more

How do you decide what not to work on when planning your year?

Image
How do you decide what not to work on when planning your year? <  1x The underrated skill of strategic quitting and intentional neglect. Big-picture framing Deciding what not to work on when planning your year is often more powerful than adding another ambitious goal. By cutting projects and habits that don’t support your direction, you free up bandwidth for work that actually moves the needle. This question isn’t just about productivity; it’s about what you want this year to mean—and which commitments quietly get in the way of that. When you learn to consciously decide what not to work on, your calendar starts to reflect your real priorities, not just your loudest obligations. Why deciding what not to work on matters Most annual plans obsess over new goals—launch the product, get promoted, start the podcast. But the quieter, sharper move is to ask,  “What will I  not  do this year?”  When you decide what not to work on up front, you’re really choosing how yo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who’s Actually at the Table on AI Ethics?

Image
Who’s Actually at the Table on AI Ethics? Mapping the people in the room before we argue who’s in charge Big picture Conversations about  AI ethics  often jump straight to blame: Who  should  be responsible when something goes wrong? This post takes a gentler, more structural angle. Instead of choosing winners or assigning fault, we simply name who is usually at the table when AI tools are built, deployed, used, and felt in the real world. By mapping those players—developers, product teams, platforms, policymakers, professionals, and impacted communities—you gain a clearer lens for any future debate about responsibility. Think of this as a stakeholder map you can carry into meetings, strategy sessions, and everyday conversations about AI. Why this isn’t a “who’s to blame” question Asking “Who’s actually at the table on AI ethics?” is different from asking “Who’s guilty if things go wrong?” It’s more like walking into a busy kitchen and first asking: Who’s cooking? Wh...
Post a Comment
Read more